SciFi-Daily: 21/01/2025

Dieser Post wird laufend ergänzt!

Er hat es gewusst.

Als sich Sir Keir Starmer vor die Kamera gestellt hat, um diejenigen, die eine Verbindung zwischen dem Massenmörder aus Southport, Axel Rudakubana und Terrorismus hergestellt haben, die den zu diesem Zeitpunkt als waliser Chorknabe verkauften Mörder mit Islamismus in Verbindung gebracht haben, als „Right Wing Thugs“ und Verbreiter von Fake News nicht nur zu denunzieren, sondern anschließend verfolgen und einsperren zu lassen, hat er gewusst, dass Axel Radukubana dreimal an das Anti-Terrorismus-Programm der Regierung „PREVENT“ durchgereicht wurde, weil seine Lehrer oder andere Leute, die mit ihm zu tun hatten, seine Freude an Genozid und Überlegungen zum Massaker an seinen Schulkameraden nicht mehr für normal gehalten haben. Jedes Mal wurde Rudakubana wieder nach Hause geschickt, weil die „Gefahr“, die von ihm ausgeht, nach Einschätzung der PREVENT-Leute nicht vorhanden war.

So kann man sich irren.

Starmer hat das alles von Anfang an gewusst und verheimlicht. Man habe Angst vor Krawallen gehabt, wenn die Wahrheit ans Tageslicht kommt, so begründet er seine Lügen. Die Verhinderung von Krawallen ist ungefähr in der Weise gelungen, in der es PREVENT gelungen ist, einen terroristischen Anschlag durch Rudakubana zu verhindern:

Aus dem Telegraph:

„Sir Keir Starmer said he knew in the wake of the Southport attack that Axel Rudakubana had previously been referred to the Prevent counter-extremism programme.

The Prime Minister said the information had not been made public at the time because of the fear that it could prejudice a potential trial.

Asked if he knew about Rudakubana’s three Prevent referrals and if he had withheld the information in an attempt to protect against further public outcry and disruption, Sir Keir told a Downing Street press conference: “Let me be clear, responsibility for the disorder and the violence lies with those that perpetrated it. We need to be really clear about that.

“Let me address the facts as you put them to me. There has been a failure here and I don’t intend to let any institution of the state deflect from their failures and I acknowledge that readily here.

“Yes, I knew the details as they were emerging. That is the usual practice in a case such as this. But you know and I know that it would not have been right to disclose those details.

“The only losers if the details had been disclosed would be the victims and the families because it ran the risk the trial would collapse. I am never going to do that.”

Sir Keir rejected the claim that there had been a “cover up” over what detail was released to the public after the attack. But he accepted an “atmosphere of mistrust will remain” unless the state addressed institutional failings.“

Ich sehe nicht, wie dieser notorische Lügner weiterhin im Amt bleiben kann.

Er hat es getan.
Die USA haben ihren Austritt aus der WHO (wieder) erklärt.
Die Gründe sind dieselben, die schon 2020 angeführt wurden: Die eklatanten Fehler bei der Behandlung von COVID-19, das finanzielle Ungleichgewicht, fehlende Unabhängigkeit und Transparenz. Mit dieser Executive Order werden alle Zahlungen an die WHO eingestellt, alle Mitarbeiter der Regierung, die zur WHO entsendet wurden, zurückgerufen.

Hard Times für Dr. Tedros.

WITHDRAWING THE UNITED STATES FROM THE WORLD

HEALTH ORGANIZATION

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

Section 1. Purpose. The United States noticed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2020 due to the organization’s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic that arose out of Wuhan, China, and other global health crises, its failure to adopt urgently needed reforms, and its inability to demonstrate independence from the inappropriate political influence of WHO member states. In addition, the WHO continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States, far out of proportion with other countries’ assessed payments. China, with a population of 1.4 billion, has 300 percent of the population of the United States, yet contributes nearly 90 percent less to the WHO.

Sec. 2. Actions. (a) The United States intends to withdraw from the WHO. The Presidential Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations signed on January 20, 2021, that retracted the United States’ July 6, 2020, notification of withdrawal is revoked.

(b) Executive Order 13987 of January 25, 2021 (Organizing and Mobilizing the United States Government to Provide a Unified and Effective Response to Combat COVID–19 and to Provide United States Leadership on Global Health and Security), is revoked.

(c) The Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs shall establish directorates and coordinating mechanisms within the National Security Council apparatus as he deems necessary and appropriate to safeguard public health and fortify biosecurity.

(d) The Secretary of State and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall take appropriate measures, with all practicable speed, to:

(i) pause the future transfer of any United States Government funds, support, or resources to the WHO;

(ii) recall and reassign United States Government personnel or contractors working in any capacity with the WHO; and

(iii) identify credible and transparent United States and international partners to assume necessary activities previously undertaken by the WHO.

(e) The Director of the White House Office of Pandemic Preparedness and Response Policy shall review, rescind, and replace the 2024 U.S. Global Health Security Strategy as soon as practicable.

Sec. 3. Notification. The Secretary of State shall immediately inform the Secretary-General of the United Nations, any other applicable depositary, and the leadership of the WHO of the withdrawal.

Sec. 4. Global System Negotiations. While withdrawal is in progress, the Secretary of State will cease negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement and the amendments to the International Health Regulations, and actions taken to effectuate such agreement and amendments will have no binding force on the United States.

[…]

THE WHITE HOUSE,

January 20, 2025.

Bleiben Sie am Ball.
Dieser Post wächst im Laufe des Tages.

Falls Sie unsere Arbeit unterstützen, und dafür sorgen wollen, dass bei ScienceFiles auch weiterhin das Rad rund läuft, dann kaufen Sie uns doch einen Kaffee:
Oder unterstützen Sie uns auf einem der folgenden Wege Unser herzlicher Dank ist Ihnen sicher! DENN: ScienceFiles lebt von Spenden. Helfen Sie uns, ScienceFiles auf eine solide finanzielle Basis zu stellen, damit Sie uns auch morgen noch lesen können!

Wir haben drei sichere Spendenmöglichkeiten: